Mickaela Mate
Accredited Specialist Criminal Lawyer

Mickaela is an Accredited Specialist in Criminal Law and the founder of Mate Lawyers. After graduating Newcastle University with First Class Honours, Mickaela worked in a boutique criminal defence firm located in Kings Cross. There, Mickaela had carriage of a wide variety of matters, from traffic matters to drug importation and murder.

 

In 2020, Mickaela started Mate Lawyers with a focus on providing the best result for each client. Mickaela takes an individualised approach, remembering that a criminal matter is likely to be the most stressful experience any of her clients experience in their life. Mickaela supports each client on their journey through the criminal justice system. Although she may be kind and empathetic to clients, Mickaela is known as strong advocate who fearlessly and fiercely represents each one of them. She is skilled at cross-examination, often receiving praise from the judicial officers on her approach to questioning. Mickaela has significant experience in a variety of criminal matters, including

 

- Sexual assault

- Drug possession, supply and importation

- Assaults, including domestic violence and assaults on police officers.

- Weapons and Firearms offences, and prohibition orders

- Robbery matters

- Driving offences, including drink and drug driving

- AVO matters

- Fraud

 

Mickaela regularly appears in all jurisdictions of NSW. Mickaela predominantly practices in metropolitan Sydney, however has a strong practice in her home town of Newcastle.

 

Solicitor details

0431 704 563
mickaela@matelawyers.au

• Admitted to practice in 2018

• Register of Practitioners of the High Court of Australia in 2021

• Awarded Accredited Specialist in Criminal Law in 2023

• Member of NSW Young Lawyers

• Member of City of Sydney Law Society

• Member of Women Lawyers Association of NSW

• Affiliated with BASIL – Brothers and Sisters in Law

CASES

Area of speciailty 1
R v GC (Drug Supply)
My client was charged with supplying a small amount of cocaine and possessing 10 000 MDMA pills for the purpose of supply. The second charge, which carried a maximum penalty of life imprisonment, relied solely upon phone intercepts and evidence of a witness in witness protection. The alleged facts were that my client had supplied two ounces to the person in witness protection on one occasion, and then had taken possession of 10 000 MDMA pills to sell on that person’s behalf. My client denied the allegations throughout the entire process. At trial, my client was found not guilty of both charges.
Area of speciailty 2
R v BL(Sexual touching)
My client was charged with grooming a child for sexual activity and sexually touching a child. The facts were that my client and a 14-year-old had commenced communicating on Snapchat and agreed to later meet up for sexual activity. After careful analysis, I determined that the Crown could not prove that my client had groomed the child. My client ultimately plead guilty and was sentenced to an 18 month term of imprisonment, with a non-parole period of only 8 months.
Area of speciailty 3
R v EB (Drug Supply)
My client was charged with causing grievous bodily harm with intent, carrying 25 years imprisonment. The facts were that following an argument with an ex-partner, who had significantly damaged her vehicle, my client drove her car at her ex-partner, pinning him between her car and his car, and then again between her car and his brick house. Following negotiations, my client plead guilty to a lesser charge and was sentenced to an Intensive Corrections Order. This meant my client did not send any time in custody and could return home to her son.

Awarded Criminal Lawyers 2024

Share by: